This blog was created to advance discussion about issues related to Vera's work. Comments from readers are encouraged. However, those that are off topic, use profanity, promote products or services, or endorse candidates for public office are subject to removal without notification.

The content of comments on Vera's blog is the sole responsibility of the commenter and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Vera Institute of Justice.

On Thursday, Vice President Biden and Manhattan DA Cy Vance announced that they will put a combined $79 million toward addressing the vast number of untested rape kits that are held in crime labs and police agencies nationwide. However, these grants to more than 40 law enforcement agencies are expected to pay for just 70,000 kits—not nearly enough to clear the national backlog.

How many untested kits are there? Nobody quite knows. One widely cited estimate says 400,000. Others say it’s impossible to know for sure, but place it in the hundreds of thousands. Despite the lack of definitive data, though, it’s clear that $79 million won’t solve this problem. Without an understanding of the number of untested rape kits nationwide, it’s impossible to know how much funding is needed to address them.

Headlines such as “Biden Announces Grants to End Rape Kit Backlog” and “Millions Earmarked to Clear ‘Disturbing’ Rape Kit Backlog,” however, imply that the justice denied to thousands of current and future victims of sexual assault has been resolved in one fell swoop. DA Vance characterized the grants announced today as "the single largest contribution toward ending the rape kit backlog that has ever been made,” and he’s right. But it’s only one step.

The Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Reporting Act, passed in 2013 as part of the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, required that the Department of Justice establish national standards for the “accurate, timely, and effective collection and processing of DNA evidence” by September 7, 2014. More than a year later, these protocols have not been developed. Efforts at the federal level to quantify and address the backlog have been underway since the Debbie Smith Backlog Grant Program—named for a young woman who was sexually assaulted in 1989 but whose rape kit wasn’t processed until 1994—was first enacted in 2004. Unfortunately, the clearing of the backlog, which seemed to be made a priority through this federal legislation, has not been made a reality.

However, substantial progress has been made by jurisdictions since the tireless work of advocates and journalists has brought national awareness to the issue in the past few years. In Cleveland, Ohio, more than 100 rapists were convicted after The Plain Dealer reporter Rachel Dissell’s investigative journalism—combined with the persistent efforts of Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy McGinty—led to the testing of nearly all of the city’s 4,000 kits. The clearing of the backlog had profound implications not only for the victims whose suffering had been ignored, but also for potential future victims, as an estimated third of the reported rapes were committed by a repeat offender.

Sexual assault is one of the most underreported crimes to begin with—victims only report rape an estimated 32 percent of the time. And while today’s announcement is a big step in the right direction, the backlog is still unacceptable. When the efforts victims take to go to the police and suffer an hours-long, invasive forensic exam are ignored, the message we send is clear: the evidence of women’s suffering isn’t worth the time and money it would take to process.

Related Topics

Bloggers